Basic Aspects of the New Civil Procedural Code

Basic Aspects of the New Civil Procedural Code

This past October 8th, the New Civil Procedural Code (NCPC) came into force, law number 9342, which repeals almost entirely the past code (CPC) and modifies important procedural institutes that adapt to the dynamics of an oral procedural system.

This orality and immediacy characteristic implies one of the pillars of the reform in the civil process, thus promoting compliance with principles such as immediacy, concentration and publicity. The foregoing does not exempt that there will be stages that will be carried out in written or digital form, only those recognized by the same Code and those that, given their nature, must be recorded in such form, must be documented.

Main changes and novelties: The New Civil Procedural Code is divided into two books. Book One regulates everything related to general provisions applicable to all processes< for example: the principles, norms and procedural subjects, the jurisdiction, the parties, the procedural acts, the acts of the parties, the acts of the court, the deadlines, the defective procedural activity and the form of rectification, the suspension of the procedure, the proof, the oral hearings, the extraordinary forms of conclusion of the process, the judicial resolutions, the means of challenge, the economic repercussion of the procedural activity, the precautionary protection and international procedural norms; and in Book Two, all types of processes are established and regulated (Ordinary, Summary, Monitoring, Execution, Third Parties, Inheritance, Non-Contentious Litigation).

Means of challenge: Chapter IV of the New Civil Procedural Code regulates the means to appeal judicial decisions, establishing a list of cases; creating a limited challenge system to avoid the unnecessary lengthening of the judicial processes; other words, actions that are subject to Revocation, Appeal, Cassation or Revision Appeal are limited. The Appeal of Cassation shall be “against judgements rendered in ordinary proceedings of greater or inestimable quantity and in the cases expressly indicated by the law”. (Article 69.1 NCPC)

Additionally, the Knowledge Processes (Ordinary, Summary and Monitoring), the Incidental, the Inheritance process, the Execution process, third parties and Non-contentious processes are regulated, the abbreviated procedure is eliminated.

Both the Law of Judicial Collection and the Eviction Law are repealed with the New Civil Procedural Code (NCPC), as it will be detailed further below.

ORDINARY PROCESS: The Ordinary process is regulated from article 101 of the NCPC, maintaining the same line of the old CPC, where all claims that do not have a procedure expressly indicated by law, must be processed through the Ordinary Process. The response time of the claim and counterclaim remain the same as the old code, which is 30 days.

Once the 30-day period has elapsed, the Judge, at his discretion or by virtue of the nature of the process or because there is no evidence to evacuate, may dispense the convening of a hearing, or go through the process in a single hearing.

If necessary, the Judge must call to a preliminary hearing where he must comply with a series of stages, among which are: report to the parties on the purpose of the process, conciliation, response of the plaintiff or the receiver of the opposing exceptions, fixation of the object of the debate, admission, proof evacuation, among others.

Once the preliminary hearing is over, if possible, due to the nature and circumstances of the process, it will be necessary to call a complimentary hearing and the parties will be given the opportunity to formulate conclusions, and finally, a judgement will be issued.

If necessary, once the preliminary hearing is over, the Judge may call a supplementary hearing within 20 days of the preliminary hearing, unless a longer period is justified.

SUMMARY PROCESS: Unlike the ordinary process, and following the same line as the previous CPC, the NCPC establishes a list of those processes that must be transacted under the provisions of the summary process regulated in article 103.1 of the NCPC, among these processes are Interdicts, demolition, eviction, those derived from a lease (except for non-payment of rent and public services), and others.

For the lawsuit Answer, the same five-day period is maintained as well as the deadline for opposing prior exceptions, which for all the processes regulated by the NCPC must be alleged at the time of answering the lawsuit (article 37.2 NCPC).

Regarding the hearing of the summary process, the Judge, at his discretion and depending on the nature and circumstances of the process, may indicate a single hearing in order to receive and evacuate the respective evidence. Likewise, as in the Ordinary process, the Judge must comply with the stages of the hearing described in article 103.3 of the NCPC.

The above characteristics are some of the general provisions that regulate the Summary process; however, there are specific procedures when the claims are related, for example, to an eviction, injunctions, suspension of new work, demolition, boasting and others.

MONITORING PROCESS: With the entry into force of the NCPC, the current Judicial Collection Law and the Eviction Law were repealed, due to the incorporation of their regulations to the NCPC, so the Monitoring process will be applied for the collection of monetary debts (with executive force or without it), such as the Eviction process, originated form a lease relationship due to the lack of payment of rent, due date, lack of payment of public services and lack of payment of condominium fees, as long as the payment obligation of this last concept corresponds to the tenant as agreed in the lease.

As the main difference with the previous CPC, we can notice that the term conceived in the injunction ordering the party to accept or oppose the claim requested by the plaintiff is now 5 days, and not 15 days as established in the Judicial Collection Law and the Eviction Law, considerably shortening the terms of the process.

PROCESSES OF FORECLOSURE AND MORTGAGE: Foreclosures and pledge foreclosures are regulated in the NCPC from article 166. It practically maintains the basis of the process of foreclosure and pledge that we know with the Law of Judicial Collections. The oppositions, like the Monitoring process for the collection of monetary debts and the eviction for the aforementioned reasons, maintain the limited opposition structure, which are restrictive, for example, for foreclosure, only the lack of enforceability, the proven payment and the prescription of the term shall be admitted and they must be filed within a period of 5 days after being notified.

Regarding the auction of assets in this type of processes, the line of the previous Judicial Collection Law is maintained, only with some changes; for example, article 159 of the NCPC indicates that the auction may be verified after five business days have elapsed from the day following the first publication of the edict and the notification of all parties, unlike the previous law that established a term of 8 business days.

In conclusion, we can affirm that the primary objective of this reform is to achieve a more rapid, timely and transparent justice system.

¿Todavía con dudas? Completá ahora el formulario y un abogado se contactará a la brevedad

We are sending your message...
We have sent your message successfully! We will contact you soon with youClose (x)
There was an error sending your message . please try again later.Close (x)

Let is start working together

Nos gustan los desafios. Estamos dispuestos a escuchar lo que tiene que decir.

Testimonials

WHAT OUR CUSTOMERS THINK

Throughout the years of experience we have delivered the best service and the best treatment for our clients, which has been translated into words of thanks from them. We share some of those words here

Search Icon

" We just wanted to say thank you and your team so very much for the professionalism, knowledge, and attention everyone has provides. we have been able to feel comfortable and know we are in great hands. "
Read more

Marla Renae Rahmin

Search Icon

" Attorney Eduardo Rojas and his highly competent team are the reason that my son has his father in his life. ERP Lawyers is a group of experts in international family law, and they are also compassionate through their practice of law. "
Read more

Eric Lentz

Search Icon

" We have really been impressed by the efficiency and professionalism of ERP Lawyers in providing the services requested. They have been very supportive of our company. We have been very satisfied, and we would not hesitate to recommend them to other people and companies. "
Read more

Adrian Gutierrez - CEO JOGO MERCADEO

Search Icon

" My experience with ERP Lawyers has been very satisfactory. They are very professional and extremely dedicated in each of their services. Their problem-solving skills are truly admirable... "
Read more

Eva Brenes Branch - Manager Ground Cargo Transportation

Search Icon

" Mundo Acuático decided more than 3 years ago to look for a firm that not only limited itself to providing us with the legal documents that were requested in different institutions, we wanted to have people who had vision... "
Read more

Daniela Solano - Manager Mundo Acuático

Search Icon

" I have been using ERP for almost 7 years. I have used Mr. Rojas and his team for family matters, residency, articles of incorporation, property puchases and investing in Costa Rica... "
Read more

Jason Roppolo

Search Icon

" Hello Eduardo, I am writing to complement your team is work in relation to my recent purchase of Condominium Unit. I was initially impressed by your team is mastery of the English Language. I have been in Costa Rica for 20 years and... "
Read more

William S

Search Icon
Search Icon

We just wanted to say thank you and your team so very much for the professionalism, knowledge, and attention everyone has provides.

Nos hemos sentido muy cómodos y sabemos que estamos en buenas manos.

I am glad Dominique entrusts you and that our paths have crossed.

We look forward to our continued relationship and being able to work with you and your experienced staff, particularly José, to help make our transition into a foreign country so much more comfortable knowing we are in the best of hands.

Marla Renae Rahmin

Search Icon
Search Icon

Attorney Eduardo Rojas and his highly competent team are the reason that my son has his father in his life.

ERP Lawyers is a group of experts in international family law, and they are also compassionate through their practice of law.

My son was abducted from the United States and taken to Costa Rica. If it weren’t for ERP Lawyers and their thorough efforts within international family law I do not think I would have been reunited with my son.

The sad fact is that family law in Costa Rica is wrongly biased towards mothers and can often violate human rights of a child to know their father.

While this is a widely known issue in Costa Rica it is immensely difficult for fathers to overcome the negative position that a father begins with in the family courts of Costa Rica.

Thanks to Eduardo Rojas and his team we were able to navigate numerous processes in order to allow my son the human right to be reunited with his father after many years

Eduardo Rojas, Jose Azofeifa, and ERP Lawyers displayed great teamwork, integrity, responsiveness, and flexibility to work with me internationally.

Moreover they were diligent and persistent in pursuing the truth through law practices that allowed my son to finally be reunited with his father.

I have Eduardo Rojas and his team to thank for future years where my son and I will justly be allowed to grow our relationship as father and son.

I give my highest recommendation to anyone needing expert and compassionate support in international family law.

Eric Lentz

Search Icon
Search Icon

We have really been impressed by the efficiency and professionalism of ERP Lawyers in providing the services requested.

They have been very supportive of our company. We have been very satisfied, and we would not hesitate to recommend them to other people and companies.

Adrian Gutierrez - CEO JOGO MERCADEO

Search Icon
Search Icon

My experience with ERP Lawyers has been very satisfactory.

They are very professional and extremely dedicated in each of their services.

Their problem-solving skills are truly admirable.

I definitely recommend ERP Lawyers to anyone looking for legal advice.

Eva Brenes Branch - Manager Ground Cargo Transportation

Search Icon
Search Icon

Mundo Acuático decided more than 3 years ago to look for a firm that not only limited itself to providing us with the legal documents that were requested in different institutions, we wanted to have people who had vision and could advise us on the different challenges and changes both Governmental and of the Private entity.

We are an SME that does not have a legal department, so it was very important to have lawyers to guide us, so that our company was always a step forward, both in administrative, labor, commercial and tax law.

It was a great pleasure to start working with ERP Lawyers and Associates, all our doubts and fears were covered, without neglecting the great kindness with which we have always been attended to.

Daniela Solano - Manager Mundo Acuático

Search Icon
Search Icon

I have been using ERP for almost 7 years.

I have used Mr. Rojas and his team for family matters, residency, articles of incorporation, property puchases and investing in Costa Rica.

ERP has consistently, been courteous professional and prompt in responding to any legal questions I have had about doing business in Costa Rica.I would highly recommend ERP to anyone that is looking to live or do business in Costa Rica.

Costa Rica is a great place to visit, live and do business and having the right counsel is absolutely necessary.

I cannot stress enough how impressed I have been with Mr. Rojas and his team.

If you are applying for residency, purchasing a home or have any questions about the way things work in Costa Rica, ERP is the best hands down.

They were initially recommended to me by the US Embassy and I have been extremely happy with them.

Jason Roppolo

Search Icon
Search Icon

Hello Eduardo, I am writing to complement your team is work in relation to my recent purchase of Condominium Unit. I was initially impressed by your team is mastery of the English Language.

I have been in Costa Rica for 20 years and normally speak Spanish 90% of the time, even with those who speak English.

I generally speak Spanish with everyone unless their English is better than my Spanish, which is not usually the case. I was also impressed with your team is attention to detail.

Over the course of the purchase, I had sent a couple of emails that contained a series of technical questions and they were answered in a precise and timely manner.

I have done a lot of real estate closings in the past, and I have more than once found errors in the closing statement. Given that I have an accounting background, I paid careful attention to the closing statement, which was perfectly prepared.

I was pleasantly surprised to see that no corrections were needed. At first, I thought it unusual to close in a MUCAP branch.

But I quickly discovered that the branch manager worked with us to quickly verify the fund is transfers and loan cancellation.

In any case, ERP Lawyers handled the entire closing very smoothly and professionally with the seller, the seller is attorney, and the bank manager and employees. In conclusion, I am happy to say that ERP lawyers did a great job

William S

Boton de cierre modal
Icono de Mapa

VISIT US

San José, Costa Rica. Sabana Oeste, de la CNFL 100 mts oeste y 100 mts norte, edificio de dos plantas a mano izquierda

New Branch:
Jacó, Putarenas, Costa Rica.Plaza Tangeri, Local #1

Icono de Teléfono

CALL US

+5062520-1122